CB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 18.04% compared to Chubb's net margin of 11.68%. Chubb's return on equity of 14% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $302.01, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $224.94 which suggests that it could grow by 16.55%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.279% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.838%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Chubb's net income of $2.6B is higher than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Allstate's PE ratio is 11.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.08x versus 0.81x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard has a net margin of 18.04% compared to Chubb's net margin of 44.63%. Chubb's return on equity of 14% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $302.01, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $614.77 which suggests that it could grow by 19.27%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.279% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.352%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Chubb's net income of $2.6B is lower than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Mastercard's PE ratio is 37.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.08x versus 16.96x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 18.04% compared to Chubb's net margin of 11.63%. Chubb's return on equity of 14% beat Progressive's return on equity of 35.88%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $302.01, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $290.2353 which suggests that it could grow by 7.45%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.279% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Chubb's net income of $2.6B is higher than Progressive's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Progressive's PE ratio is 18.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.08x versus 2.11x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 18.04% compared to Chubb's net margin of 17.33%. Chubb's return on equity of 14% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $302.01, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $271.68 which suggests that it could grow by 9.08%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.467, which suggesting that the stock is 53.279% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.825%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. Chubb's net income of $2.6B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 11.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.08x versus 1.24x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.